Don't Buy Another FinOps Tool. Validate the One You Have First.
We test your FinOps tool's accuracy against 12 cost dimensions and your provider invoices. Most tools fail 3–5 dimensions on first assessment.
You might be experiencing...
FinOps Tooling Evaluation applies the same test methodology we use for FinOps processes to the tools that support them.
Engagement Phases
Baseline Export
Export 90 days of provider billing data (AWS CUR, GCP Billing, Azure Cost Export). Establish ground truth for comparison.
Accuracy Testing
Compare tool output against provider invoices across 12 cost dimensions: compute, storage, network, reserved instances, savings plans, support fees, shared resources, and more.
Report & Recommendation
Deliver tool accuracy scorecard, feature coverage matrix, TCO analysis, and vendor-independent recommendation.
Deliverables
Before & After
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Accuracy (dimensions passing) | 7/12 dimensions | 12/12 after reconfiguration |
| Billing Reconciliation Gap | 4.2% | 0.8% |
Tools We Use
Frequently Asked Questions
Which FinOps tools do you evaluate?
We evaluate any FinOps platform: Kubecost, OpenCost, CloudHealth, Apptio Cloudability, CloudCheckr, Spot.io, AWS Cost Explorer, GCP BigQuery Billing, Azure Cost Management, and any FOCUS-compliant tool. We are completely vendor-neutral.
What if our tool fails the evaluation — do you help us switch?
We deliver a vendor-independent recommendation with migration risk assessment. We can implement a tool migration as a separate engagement, but the evaluation deliverable is a scored report — not a sales pitch for a specific tool.
Get Your FinOps Defect Score
Book a free 30-minute cloud cost review. We will identify your top three FinOps gaps and give you a preliminary Defect Score — no pitch, no obligation.
Talk to an Expert