GPU Spend Is the Fastest-Growing Line Item. It's Also the Least Governed.
H100s at $32/hr. Training jobs that run until manually killed. AI teams with no cost attribution. We build the GPU cost governance layer your MLOps team hasn't had time for.
You might be experiencing...
AI/GPU Cost Governance QA is finops.qa’s fastest-growing service — the 12-month first-mover window for AI cost governance is open now.
Engagement Phases
Cost Attribution Mapping
Map GPU spend by team, project, experiment, and inference endpoint. Establish the AI/ML Cost Attribution Map.
Governance Testing
Test cost attribution accuracy, idle GPU detection, training run budget controls, and inference endpoint cost tracking.
Tooling & Handover
Configure Kubecost ML namespace tagging, implement idle GPU detection workflow, deliver unit economics dashboard.
Deliverables
Before & After
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Spend Attribution | 34% | 91% |
| Idle GPU Cost (nights/weekends) | $28,000/mo | $3,200/mo |
| Training Run Overruns | 7/quarter | 0 |
| Cost-Per-Inference Tracked | 0% of endpoints | 87% of endpoints |
Tools We Use
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is standard FinOps tooling insufficient for GPU workloads?
Standard FinOps tools were designed for instance-level attribution — one VM, one cost owner. GPU workloads are job-level: one GPU cluster may run 50 training jobs from 8 teams simultaneously. The attribution model requires job-level tagging, scheduling awareness, and GPU utilisation data that standard tools don't collect.
Do you support on-premise GPU infrastructure, or only cloud?
Primarily cloud GPU (AWS, GCP, Azure, CoreWeave, Lambda Labs). For hybrid environments with on-prem GPU clusters, we scope the engagement based on what instrumentation is available.
Get Your FinOps Defect Score
Book a free 30-minute cloud cost review. We will identify your top three FinOps gaps and give you a preliminary Defect Score — no pitch, no obligation.
Talk to an Expert